Another great article on the drawbacks of mammograms

1663_e449b9317dad920c0dd5ad0a2a2d5e49I posted a link to an article a few days ago that was critical of the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s emphasis on mammograms as a cure-all for breast cancer.

Here is a fantastic article on why news anchor Amy Robach’s post-mammogram double mastectomy might be sending the wrong message. It’s called An Inspiring, Misleading Tale About Breast-Cancer Screening and it appeared today in Nautilus.  Definitely worth a read!

The Susan G. Komen Foundation–Maybe Not Such a Great Cause

KomenAd-228x300You know the Susan G. Komen Foundation. The ubiquitous pink ribbons that symbolize breast cancer awareness? That’s them. You might also remember they were involved in a big scandal last year when they decided to halt their grants to Planned Parenthood, seemingly motivated by the politics of Karen Handel, the Vice-President of Public Policy at that time.

While I’m all in favor of breast cancer prevention and treatment, the Susan G. Komen Foundation has been driving me crazy for a long time. Rather than keeping women abreast of the best scientific research on breast cancer, their campaigns actually spread misinformation.

Science writer Christie Aschwanden was just awarded the prize for best Commentary/Opinion piece by the National Association of Science Writers for her blog post The real scandal: science denialism at Susan G. Komen for the Cure. I wanted to post that article here, because I love it so much. In a nutshell, Aschwanden points out the problems with focusing on mammograms as the primary means of preventing breast cancer deaths: the false positives, the unnecessary medical procedures (which come with their own risks), the fast-growing tumors in which screening is not very useful, and the victim-blaming that the Komen campaigns can encourage. I wish all women would read it.